[PRESS STATEMENT] Standing In Solidarity with MalaysiaKini: Apex Court’s Decision Sets Worrying Precedent

[PRESS STATEMENT] Standing In Solidarity with MalaysiaKini: Apex Court’s Decision Sets Worrying Precedent

Picture Taken from Malay Mail

The Civil Society Cluster on Freedom of Expression (and the endorsing organizations) is extremely concerned at the implications of the Malaysian Federal Court’s decision on 19 February 2021 holding Malaysiakini guilty of contempt of court in relation to third-party comments on their news site.

While the court acquitted Malaysiakini’s editor-in-chief Steven Gan, the Court fined Malaysiakini RM500,000, more than double the amount suggested by the federal prosecutors from the Attorney General’s Chambers. The Court stated that the fine reflected the gravity of the offense and the case should be a reminder to the public not to use online comments to attack the judiciary. The contempt of court case was filed against Malaysiakini and its editor-in-chief Steven Gan in June 2020 in relation to reader comments relating to the judiciary.

The Federal Court’s decision also highlights the problematic nature of section 114A of the Evidence Act, which was passed in 2012. This section allowed the Court to presume that Malaysiakini was the publisher of the third party comments, simply by the comments appearing on their website. This places a disproportionate burden on internet intermediaries to disprove that they were not the publisher of any offending comments.

This decision will have a wide-reaching impact on news sites in Malaysia and in fact, any site that allows reader comments. Despite evidence proffered that Malaysiakini had no knowledge of the comments in question, the majority (6-1) in the Federal Court deemed the site to have had notice of them, given their editorial structure and the related safeguards they have in place. It also found Malaysiakini guilty despite evidence that the site had immediately removed the comments once they had been flagged by the police.

This precedent, where a site is deemed to have knowledge of the content of third-party comments, will prove especially challenging for news sites. Online portals, that are already facing financial pressure and challenges, will now have to decide whether to expend significant resources to moderate every comment on their sites, or risk being held liable for third-party content.

Any actions taken to regulate how internet intermediaries deal with third-party comments must take into account the importance of the right to freedom of expression and the right of individuals to express their views online. We are of the view that imposing legal liability on internet intermediaries for reader comments that they did not have knowledge of, contravenes international human rights standards, which require that any restrictions on the human right to freedom of expression be necessary and proportionate.

It is especially chilling for such action to be taken against a media outlet, during a time when the flow of information and the ability of the media to act as a check and balance against the government is more important than ever.

We stand in solidarity with Malaysiakini and we call upon the Malaysian government to repeal section 114A of the Evidence Act and to refrain from any further actions that could threaten media freedom in Malaysia.

Issued by the Civil Society Coalition on Freedom of Expression:

  1. Gerakan Media Merdeka (Geramm)
  2. Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ)
  3. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
  4. Justice for Sisters
  5. Sinar Project
  6. Freedom Film Network (FFN)
  7. Sisters in Islam (SIS)
  8. Kryss Network

Endorsed by:

  1. Association of Women Lawyers (AWL)
  2. Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO)
  3. TENAGANITA
  4. Projek Wawasan Rakyat (POWR)
  5. Beyond Borders Malaysia
  6. Our Journey
  7. Bersih 2.0
  8. Women’s Centre for Change (WCC)
  9. Family Frontiers
  10. Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia (Proham)
  11. G25
  12. ENGAGE
  13. Community Action Network (CAN).
  14. EMPOWER Malaysia
  15. Gabungan Bertindak Malaysia (GBM)
  16. Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS)
  17. Penang Forum
  18. Persatuan Patriot Kebangsaan (PATRIOT)
  19. Agora Society Malaysia
  20. Pusat Komas
  21. Citizens Against Enforced Disappearances, (CAGED)
  22. North-South Initiative
  23. Pergerakan Tenaga Akademik Malaysia (GERAK)
  24. Aliran
  25. Centre to Combat Corruption & Cronyism (C4)
  26. The KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall Youth
  27. Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy
  28. Hara Mekar Initiative
  29. WISDOM Foundation
  30. Jaringan Kampung Orang Asli Semenanjung Malaysia (JKOASM)
  31. Sabah Women Action-Resource Group (SAWO)
  32. Advancing Knowledge in Democracy and Law Initiative
  33. Childline Foundation
  34. Partners of Community Organisations (PACOS)
  35. Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia
  36. The KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall Women Division
  37. Women Development Organisation of Malaysia PJ Branch
  38. All Women’s Action Society (AWAM)

Individuals

  1. Sudhagaran Stanley
  2. Ivy N Josiah
  3. Shanti Dairiam
  4. Andrew Khoo
  5. Muhammad Sha’ani bin Abdullah

Full endorsement list here.

%d bloggers like this: